Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Isabella Shinikova vs Emeline Dartron Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shinikova vs Dartron analysis and find out who is favored!
Isabella Shinikova vs Emeline Dartron Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shinikova has won 45.45% of points on his second serve, while Dartron has won 45.82%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shinikova, in recent form, has won 55.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Dartron has won 50.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.15% and 38.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shinikova has saved 52.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dartron has saved 53.63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shinikova has won 60% of matches played (W/L 45/ 30), with Dartron winning 51.11% (W/L 23/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shinikova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 155/ 85), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 27% (W/L 4/ 11). Dartron has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 47/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 21/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Shinikova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 42/ 27), where as Dartron has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 19/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shinikova has played against opponents with an average rank of 293.51 while Dartron has played against players with an average rank of 316.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shinikova has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dartron has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shinikova has converted 45.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dartron has converted 45.45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shinikova 0 - 0 Dartron
256
Rank
133
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
504
Rank
364
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
60% (575-386)
Career Total W/L
53% (153-134)
53% (16-14)
YTD W/L
50% (11-11)
$232,173
Career Prize Money
$823
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Isabella Shinikova | Emeline Dartron |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (16/14) | 50% (11/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (36/32) | 49% (24/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (333/310) | 49% (218/229) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 56% (9/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 44 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 126 | 82 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:30 | 1:43:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 279.63 | 296.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1212/2008) | 63% (950/1512) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (727/1212) | 61% (578/950) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (356/796) | 46% (258/562) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (133/284) | 46% (75/164) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (1004/2128) | 44% (618/1419) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (13/12) | 44% (7/9) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (2/2) | 80% (4/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (16/30) | 50% (11/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 14% (1/7) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 25% (12/3) |
Isabella Shinikova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Isabella Shinikova
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Sandra Samir
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Oceanne Lopez
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marie Benoit
Player
Isabella Shinikova
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
10
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
105)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
57%
(
65 of
114)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
30%
(
8 of
27)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
47%
(
54 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Isabella Shinikova
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Isabella Shinikova
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Ruien Zhang
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Emeline Dartron Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Emeline Dartron
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
58%
(
65 of
112)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Manon Leonard
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Kathleen Kanev
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Emma Fulvia Wiesenfeld
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diana Demidova
Player
Emeline Dartron
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Madison Bourguignon
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Emeline Dartron
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emeline Dartron
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Emeline Dartron
48%
(
38 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
1-6 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Shinikova Vs Dartron Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
